![]() (The total size listed above is the simple addition of the component sizes. The developer tools components (all of which are optional) look like this: Mac OS X 10.1 Developer Tools My guess is that components with code changes make up the bulk of the upgrade installation. Third, components that have not had any code changes may have been recompiled with the (presumably) improved version of Apple's compiler. ![]() Second, many components have had code changes since 10.0.4: bug fixes, new features, optimizations, etc. First, some components are completely new (e.g. I suspect there are three reasons for this. That's a lot of new or changed files for a fairly minimal install of a ".1" revision upgrade. I chose not to install the foreign language kits, leaving the total tonnage of changed bits at 254,792K, according to my calculations-which may or may not agree with the installer's. I chose the "upgrade" installation, installing on top of 10.0.4 on both the G3/400 (on the 12GB drive) and dual G4/450. (Yes, I know the columns don't add up to the totals listed, but I'm just going by what the installer application displayed. ![]() The component selection for both a clean install and an upgrade to 10.1 are shown below (required components are in bold): Mac OS X 10.1 Components ![]() The differences are mainly in the choices and sizes of the installed components. The 10.1 installer looks and behaves almost exactly like the 10.0 installer. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |